Archive for March, 2011

Political contributions and $200 taxi rides: Fiesta fires its CEO

We’re not talking about something of the stature of the green sport coats awarded to the winners of the Masters, but in college football circles, everyone seemed to be happy when the yellow jackets showed up in your town.

Those coats belong to the folks who run the Fiesta Bowl, one of our designated BCS bowl games; when the yellow jackets show up in town, it probably means you’re having a pretty good season and an invitation for a January trip to Phoenix could be on the way.

And as we found out this week, maybe some other goodies as well.

After a third-party investigation into his conduct wrapped up this week, the Fiesta Bowl’s board abruptly fired the guy who had built a minor bowl game into one of big ones over the last 30 years. Why was John Junker shit-canned? It’s tough to say whether the Fiesta Bowl would have gained its current stature without his apparent schemes to compensate Bowl employees for their “suggested” contributions to politicians and as much as $2.5 million in personal, potentially inappropriate or undetermined expenses Junker charged to the organization between 2001 and the start of this year.

The political contribution scheme was simple. Employees said they were never told they had to make contributions to politicos friendly to the bowl’s cause, but the practice was “encouraged.” In return, they were reimbursed for those contributions. And yes, that is illegal.

Junker apparently roared though money like the bowl game had a license to print it. The report issued by the investigators said Junker averaged more than $37,000 a month in expenses — many of which weren’t documented — and in December, 2005, he claimed $348,000 in business expenses. I’m sure the executive running a BCS game is going to have to be a little spendy in the weeks before the event, but Junker apparently didn’t like including documentation when he submitted those bills; in the report, the bowl’s controller told investigators that going through Junker’s monthly American Express bills was “taxing.”

I don’t think she was talking about the IRS, either.

When Junker was fired on Wednesday, the BCS fired an ominous-sounding shot towards Phoenix, saying the Fiesta Bowl would have to justify its future participation as a BCS game (something, I imagine, that the people who run the Cotton Bowl loved to hear, given their recent move into the Jerry Jones Dome in Dallas). Here’s a snippet, attributed by the Associated Press to BCS Executive Director Bill Hancock and Penn State President Graham Spanier, who runs the group of college presidents who oversee the BCS:

“We are deeply disappointed and troubled to learn of these findings related to the Fiesta Bowl. Unprofessional, unethical or improper behavior is unacceptable. There is no place for such activities in higher education or in collegiate sports. It is expected that all parties contracted with the BCS will live up to the highest standards. We do not wish to be associated with entities that believe otherwise. “

Tough talk, yes, and probably the appropriate response.

But wait, the BCS folks said today. Perhaps we were a little hasty. Especially after the Arizona Republic revealed that some of the BCS folks who will be investigating the Fiesta Bowl — including Hancock — had accepted gifts from Fiesta Bowl, usually involving golf and other freebies at the rather expensive courses in the Phoenix area, and from the Orange Bowl, in the form of an annual Caribbean cruise for athletics directors, conference commissioners and their spouses.

Whoops.

In that story, Hancock said he didn’t see anything wrong with letting the Fiesta Bowl pay for his rounds of golf (Hey, maybe those would have shown up in the expense forms that Junker never filed!); he also told the Republic that discussions about cutting the Fiesta out of the BCS were “premature” and chided the media for speculating about a possible replacement (which is exactly what I just did a couple paragraphs ago. Sorry ’bout that, Bill).

The Fiesta Bowl is in trouble because its former CEO couldn’t — or wouldn’t — be transparent about what he was doing to run the organization. And then a day after the BCS shouts about ethics and the highest standards, etc., we find out that some of the people who will be deciding the Fiesta’s fate had been happily receiving gifts from Junker and the bowl for years.

Does anyone else feel like they need a shower?

—-

Want to read all 283 pages of the investigators’ report on Junker and the Fiesta Bowl? You’ll find a .pdf here.

Longoria Truly A Young Gun

I know spring training isn’t all sweetness and light, but I had no idea just how cut-throat it had become. To wit, Evan Longoria’s recent loss of his AK-47 assault rifle in a burglary. Really, Evan? You think your job is in jeopardy? Gonna rub somebody out? Or maybe just blow the shit out of some alligator?
Evan Longoria

Image by Keith Allison, licensed under Creative Commons.

Anyway, fan reaction to this revelation about Longoria has been mixed and seemingly based on personal feelings about gun ownership, but some have found Longoria’s weapon choice surprising and not in keeping with his boy next door image. Just because he isn’t emailing pictures of his penis doesn’t mean he isn’t packing heat.

Young gun, indeed.

Swoopes Signs with Shock

Whoa. Say that 5 times fast.

Sheryl Swoopes, a WNBA pioneer, has rejoined the league, signing with the Tulsa Shock for the 2011 season. She turned 40 this week.

Swoopes retired after the 2008 season after two seasons of back problems. She has played in Greece for the last 2 years and says that “I can honestly say physically my body feels better than it’s probably felt in the last two or three years I played in the WNBA.”

The Shock is hoping that her all-career averages of 15.8 points, 5.0 rebounds, 3.3 assists and 2.2 steals will help the team after a dismal 6-28 season last year.

Swoopes has a storied career in basketball including playing on three gold-winning Olympic teams.

[Image courtesy of Lucas Swoopes Basketball]

Source Source

Do Athletes Think Faster?

Can playing sports actually help focus your brain? Researchers are starting to think so.

An article published in The Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine earlier this month shows research that seems to support the theory that athletes excel not only at sports, but at every day tasks. We all know that athletes are more likely to be in excellent physical shape than someone like me. Sure, I exercise and occasionally play a game of softball or basketball, but I am a writer. I spend most of my time sitting in front of my computer. While I expect a soccer player to be able to run faster than me or to have more physical endurance, I like to think that I am mentally agile.

Perhaps I am just special (again, I find myself in need of the sarcasm font) but researchers at the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign have proven that the athletes made quicker decisions than the non-athletes in a study that tested how quickly and safely students could cross a trafficked road.

From Gretchen Reynolds in the New York Times:

The student athletes completed more successful crossings than the nonathletes, by a significant margin, a result that might be expected of those in peak physical condition. But what was surprising — and thought-provoking — was that their success was not a result of their being quicker or more athletic. They walked no faster than the other students. They didn’t dash or weave gracefully between cars. What they did do was glance along the street a few more times than the nonathletes, each time gathering slightly more data and processing it more speedily and accurately than the other students.

“They didn’t move faster,” said Art Kramer, the director of the Beckman Institute and a leader in the study of exercise and cognition, who oversaw the research. “But it looks like they thought faster.”

That is fascinating.

I am a musician. I’ve seen tons of studies that show music is good for the mind. We know music is math based and kids who can read music tend to do better in school. The stereotypical child who takes orchestra in school usually gets pretty good grades. (Yes, I realize that the parent that encourages their child to play the a stringed instrument is also likely to be concerned with academics, but let’s just roll with the stereotype for now.) But we rarely think of the jock — the wrestler, the basketball star, or a football player — as being a straight A student, or even all that bright in the first place. I am not saying that the perception is fair; I am talking about societal archetypes — think The Breakfast Club.

Sure, we all know the wide receiver who was valedictorian, or the girl on the soccer team who got a full academic scholarship to an Ivy League school, but it isn’t necessarily the first thing you think of when you think of an athlete.

But maybe it should be. You’ve heard of “the zone,” right?

Sports emphasize the importance of mental conditioning for athletes in order to yield success on and off the field.

When an athlete is “in the zone,” the synchronization of mind and body allows the individual to excel beyond mental and physical challenges; the results of the revelatory study performed at the Beckman Institute show exciting new evidence that skills conditioned by athletes may impact their mental dexterity and the way they think entirely.

Jessica Rutledge, The Informer

Sports offer physical and mental conditioning. This might just be what is giving our athletes the edge on processing information. It seems to hold true for both individual and team sports.

It is fascinating research and it makes me very happy that I signed my kids up for t-ball. Now I just have to up my own game. Mind, body and spirit right? Well that and I don’t want my kids thinking faster than me. That is how a person ends up buying a pony.

Originally written for and posted on BlogHer.com

[photo: Adensw]

Draft Day Suit March Madness Bracket Update

How are your brackets? Yeah, mine are totally screwed too. I suppose this isn’t too surprising. I mean – how many people had VCU in the final four? Not very many. In fact:

Yeah, two out of almost six million.

Not too surprisingly out of the 64 brackets filled out for Draft Day Suit, none of us correctly picked the final four. The good news is that if you have one or two of the right teams in the final four you still might have a chance at winning.

Here are the top teams as of this morning.

It is looking good for you if you are MAJOKADABA.

So yeah, my brackets might suck, but I am loving this tournament. Who do you think will take it home?

Blog Widget by LinkWithin